<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Caine Says Riddler to be Batman3 Villain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/batman3_villain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/batman3_villain/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Kingsley</title>
		<link>http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/batman3_villain/comment-page-1/#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Kingsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/?p=1362#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine another villian more appropriate for a thrid film.  However, I don&#039;t think that a Jim Carrey approach to the Riddler would be right, but a more subtle, deadlier approach. I never really cared for Gorshin&#039;s campy style, even though it fit with the overall campiness of the 60&#039;s Batman TV show. Nolan&#039;s Batman has to have villians we can imagine meeting on the streets of reality, not in a circus. So that&#039;s going to leave out a lot Batman villians in Nolan&#039;s version.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine another villian more appropriate for a thrid film.  However, I don&#8217;t think that a Jim Carrey approach to the Riddler would be right, but a more subtle, deadlier approach. I never really cared for Gorshin&#8217;s campy style, even though it fit with the overall campiness of the 60&#8217;s Batman TV show. Nolan&#8217;s Batman has to have villians we can imagine meeting on the streets of reality, not in a circus. So that&#8217;s going to leave out a lot Batman villians in Nolan&#8217;s version.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: where to get tamiflu</title>
		<link>http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/batman3_villain/comment-page-1/#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>where to get tamiflu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/?p=1362#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>batman is a good series whatever peoplesay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>batman is a good series whatever peoplesay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shann1</title>
		<link>http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/batman3_villain/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>shann1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/?p=1362#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get why so many people think the Riddler is banal in the comics.  He has a ton of potential and tapping into that potential is what Nolan&#039;s movies have been all about so far. Comics like Hush have proven that the Riddler has the intellectual prowess to go up against many of Gotham&#039;s toughest villains and heroes.  Besides, many of Batman&#039;s villains (and Batman himself)  have updated their equipment to become more fearsome foes. You can&#039;t tell me that the Riddler being a brilliant computer hacker would go against his role in the comics or make him out of character- he was created in 1948,  it&#039;s not just OK to update him it&#039;s necessary! I think the only reason some guys complain about him is that he&#039;s not a very violent villain...death count doesn&#039;t necessarily equal a cool villain. It&#039;d be easy to have him and another, more violent villain without becoming Spiderman 3ish. Nolan&#039;s proven he can do it and as long as he doesn&#039;t go more than two it could work fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get why so many people think the Riddler is banal in the comics.  He has a ton of potential and tapping into that potential is what Nolan&#8217;s movies have been all about so far. Comics like Hush have proven that the Riddler has the intellectual prowess to go up against many of Gotham&#8217;s toughest villains and heroes.  Besides, many of Batman&#8217;s villains (and Batman himself)  have updated their equipment to become more fearsome foes. You can&#8217;t tell me that the Riddler being a brilliant computer hacker would go against his role in the comics or make him out of character- he was created in 1948,  it&#8217;s not just OK to update him it&#8217;s necessary! I think the only reason some guys complain about him is that he&#8217;s not a very violent villain&#8230;death count doesn&#8217;t necessarily equal a cool villain. It&#8217;d be easy to have him and another, more violent villain without becoming Spiderman 3ish. Nolan&#8217;s proven he can do it and as long as he doesn&#8217;t go more than two it could work fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Solar Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/batman3_villain/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>The Solar Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/?p=1362#comment-911</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not too familiar with the DC Universe (Sorry!) but couldn&#039;t Black Mask be the villain in the next movie? He could start a gang war right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not too familiar with the DC Universe (Sorry!) but couldn&#8217;t Black Mask be the villain in the next movie? He could start a gang war right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edythemighty</title>
		<link>http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/batman3_villain/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>edythemighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/?p=1362#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Considering there are plants and even toads that secrete toxins that cause incredible hallucinations, man-made fear inducing toxins don&#039;t seem that much of a stretch. Contrast with super steroids that are supposed to give you the size of 3-5 men and vitals skyrocketing all over the place....Might just be me, but I find Bane a bit farfetched. Any normal person&#039;s heart would explode if they went through that.

I have to agree in part, Gorshin was awesome, though his portrayal would be considered too campy. He&#039;d probably have that sinister aspect....However, he is the perfect choice considering all those Easter eggs mentioned, and the very fact that Batman&#039;s identity is the riddle on everyone&#039;s mind, especially after he is accused with Harvey Dent&#039;s death. Who other than the Riddler would you associate with unraveling such a mystery bit by bit throughout the course of the movie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering there are plants and even toads that secrete toxins that cause incredible hallucinations, man-made fear inducing toxins don&#8217;t seem that much of a stretch. Contrast with super steroids that are supposed to give you the size of 3-5 men and vitals skyrocketing all over the place&#8230;.Might just be me, but I find Bane a bit farfetched. Any normal person&#8217;s heart would explode if they went through that.</p>
<p>I have to agree in part, Gorshin was awesome, though his portrayal would be considered too campy. He&#8217;d probably have that sinister aspect&#8230;.However, he is the perfect choice considering all those Easter eggs mentioned, and the very fact that Batman&#8217;s identity is the riddle on everyone&#8217;s mind, especially after he is accused with Harvey Dent&#8217;s death. Who other than the Riddler would you associate with unraveling such a mystery bit by bit throughout the course of the movie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
